A company has a Direct Connect connection from a US on-prem data center to a transit gateway in us-east-1 using a transit VIF. A new Europe data center in England will connect to workloads in a VPC in eu-west-2 using Direct Connect. The company needs full connectivity between the data centers and Regions with the lowest latency. How should the network be designed?

The correct option establishes a new transit gateway in eu-west-2 for the Europe data center and VPC, connecting the data center via a Direct Connect gateway and transit VIF. Both the us-east-1 and eu-west-2 transit gateways are associated with the same Direct Connect gateway, allowing direct connectivity between the data centers. Enabling SiteLink on both transit VIFs optimizes data center-to-data center traffic over the AWS global network, providing lower latency than routing through a VPC. Finally, peering the two transit gateways enables full connectivity between the VPCs in both regions. Incorrect options either use a private VIF, which does not support SiteLink for data center-to-data center connectivity, or propose creating multiple Direct Connect gateways, which is unnecessary and adds complexity when a single DXGW can connect to multiple transit gateways.