A company needs a hybrid network architecture. Workloads run in AWS and on-premises and require single-digit millisecond latencies. The company uses an AWS Transit Gateway to connect multiple VPCs. Which combination of steps will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively? (Choose two.)

The correct options provide a cost-effective solution for hybrid connectivity with low latency using AWS Direct Connect and Transit Gateway. Establishing an AWS Direct Connect connection with a transit VIF to a Direct Connect gateway allows for a dedicated, high-bandwidth, low-latency connection from on-premises to AWS. Associating this Direct Connect gateway with the Transit Gateway enables all connected VPCs to leverage this single Direct Connect connection, centralizing network connectivity and reducing costs compared to multiple individual connections. Incorrect options: Establishing an AWS Site-to-Site VPN to each VPC would be more expensive and would not meet the single-digit millisecond latency requirement due to reliance on the public internet. Establishing an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection to an AWS Direct Connect gateway is not a standard or efficient configuration; VPNs typically connect directly to a VPC or Transit Gateway. Associating AWS Site-to-Site VPN connections with the transit gateway would offer better routing than individual VPNs but still wouldn't meet the low-latency requirement of Direct Connect.