A company uses a payment processing system that requires messages for a particular payment ID to be received in the same order they were sent. Otherwise, payments might be processed incorrectly. Which actions should a solutions architect take to meet this requirement? (Choose two.)

To ensure messages for a particular payment ID are processed in order, both Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon SQS FIFO queues are suitable. Kinesis Data Streams use a partition key (here, the payment ID) to route all messages for that key to a specific shard, preserving order within that shard. SQS FIFO queues guarantee message ordering and exactly-once processing. By setting the message group ID to the payment ID, all messages with the same group ID are processed in the order they are sent. DynamoDB is a NoSQL database and while it can store messages, it doesn't inherently enforce processing order for a stream of messages. ElastiCache for Memcached is an in-memory key-value store primarily for caching, not for ordered message processing. A standard SQS queue (non-FIFO) does not guarantee message order.