A multi-agent remediation run produced a draft pull request that failed validation. The team needs to perform post-hoc analysis before deciding whether to resume the implementation agent, change the triage scope, or close the pull request. Evidence is available in the workflow logs, run-specific artifacts, pull request timeline, and check results. Which four actions should you perform in order? 1. Decide the next agent action based on correlated evidence 2. Compare the triage scope to implementation diff and validation failures 3. Download the run-specific triage, implementation, and validation artifacts 4. Rerun the implementation agent using the previous prompt unchanged 5. Open the workflow run logs and identify failed or skipped jobs 6. Mark the draft pull request ready for review before analysis

The correct sequence for post-hoc analysis is to first identify the failed or skipped jobs in the workflow logs (5), as this provides the initial context for where issues occurred. Next, download the run-specific artifacts (3), which contain detailed output from the triage, implementation, and validation steps, essential for deeper investigation. Then, compare the triage scope with the implementation diff and validation failures (2) to understand if the initial problem definition was accurate and how the implementation deviated, leading to the failures. Finally, based on this correlated evidence, decide the next appropriate agent action (1), such as resuming the implementation agent with adjustments, changing the triage scope, or closing the pull request. Option 3 → 4 → 2 → 1 is incorrect because rerunning the implementation agent (4) before analysis is premature and likely to repeat the failure. Option 2 → 5 → 3 → 1 is incorrect because comparing the triage scope (2) without first reviewing logs or artifacts lacks foundational context. Option 5 → 6 → 3 → 2 is incorrect because marking the pull request ready for review (6) before analysis is inappropriate for a failed draft.