A reviewer is checking whether an agent has enough context to work safely without being given unnecessary access. Match each execution-context signal to the best review decision. Which mapping is correct?

1-C: Starting Copilot CLI from ~/work/billing-api indicates the agent's working directory is scoped to this specific project, which is appropriate. The reviewer should keep this repository scope but continue reviewing the agent's proposed changes to ensure safety and correctness. 2-D: The presence of untracked prod-export.csv in git status suggests sensitive production data might be exposed locally. Before the agent interacts with the repository, this sensitive data should be removed or isolated to prevent accidental exposure or manipulation by the agent. 3-A: If copilot-setup-steps.yml installs dependencies from the repository root, but the agent is working in a sub-directory, it could lead to incorrect dependency resolution or unintended modifications outside its intended scope. The working directory used by the setup steps should be fixed to align with the agent's operational context. 4-B: Exposing a broad external ticketing tool through MCP configuration gives the agent extensive access that might not be necessary for its current task. To minimize potential risks and adhere to the principle of least privilege, the scope of this tool should be reduced before assigning the task to the agent.