A route-map references access-list NON-CISCO to influence forwarding. Which two describe the resulting behavior?

When a route-map uses an access-list with a "permit" statement, it matches traffic. If the route-map's "set" clauses are not met (e.g., no next-hop specified for policy-based routing), or if the route-map itself has no "set" clauses, then the router will proceed with normal routing table lookups for forwarding. The access-list NON-CISCO is referenced by the route-map, meaning that traffic will be evaluated against its entries, starting with the lowest sequence number (e.g., sequence 10). An access-list's primary function in this context is to define interesting traffic for the route-map; it doesn't directly drop packets unless it's applied as an inbound/outbound filter on an interface. If the route-map doesn't explicitly modify forwarding, normal routing occurs.