A self-organizing team that was meeting commitments accepted work using new technology, and iteration velocity has dropped. What management action is appropriate?

The correct answer is to provide opportunities for team members to learn and adapt to the new technology. A self-organizing team that was previously meeting commitments likely has the capability but needs support in a new area. Investing in training and learning allows the team to overcome the challenge and regain velocity, fostering growth and maintaining team cohesion. Removing underperforming members is premature and punitive, especially when the cause is new technology, not individual failure. Adding new members can initially decrease velocity due to onboarding overhead and may not address the core skill gap. Reassigning the project undermines the existing team's autonomy and growth potential.