A sponsor often asks the project manager to skip retrospectives due to time constraints. The project manager insists on holding them but shortens preparation and discussion time. What two problems could this cause? (Choose two.)

Shortening preparation and discussion time for retrospectives can lead to a lack of direction and motivation because the team may not have a clear understanding of the retrospective's purpose or the issues to be discussed. This can result in unfocused conversations and a feeling that the retrospective is unproductive. Additionally, without adequate time for reflection and constructive dialogue, the retrospective can devolve into a session where only negative aspects are highlighted without sufficient exploration of solutions or successes. This can foster a sense of disinterest in future improvements, as the team may perceive the retrospective as a blame game rather than an opportunity for growth. "Either too many discussions with no actionable outcomes, or an overload of outcomes" is less precise; while possible, the core issues are direction and morale. "Lessons learned from other teams may be ignored" is not directly caused by shortening this retrospective's time. "The retrospective workshop's time management plan is not updated" is a symptom, not a primary problem for the team.