An agent-generated pull request fails after a workflow restores a cached context directory. The maintainer says the workflow appears to be using yesterday’s dependency and issue summary even though the issue was updated this morning. Which option best explains the failure? Select one answer.

The workflow restored a cached context using the broad key Linux-agent-context. This key doesn't incorporate elements that change frequently, like the head SHA or issue ID. Consequently, an outdated cache from yesterday was retrieved, containing an old issue summary and dependency information. The agent then acted on this stale data, leading to a pull request that failed tests because it didn't reflect the morning's updates. To prevent this, the cache key should be more specific, perhaps including github.sha or github.event.issue.number to ensure the cache is invalidated and rebuilt when relevant changes occur. The pullrequest trigger did run the workflow, as evidenced by the output. Artifact retention is irrelevant here; this is about cache restoration, not artifact deletion. The GITHUBTOKEN permissions are not the issue; the problem is the content of the restored context, not the ability to read issues.