EIGRP summary with leak-map was configured but the specific Loopback0 (10.1.1.1/30) is not advertised along with the summary. Which two changes fix this? (Choose two.)

The correct access-list entry is access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 because it correctly matches the network address 10.1.1.0 with a wildcard mask for a /30 subnet. The option access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.252 is incorrect as it uses the host address and an inverted wildcard mask. The correct route-map entry is route-map Leak-Route permit 10 and match access-list 1. This entry explicitly creates a permit statement (sequence 10) within the Leak-Route route-map and associates it with access-list 1, which defines the specific route to be leaked. The option access-list 1 and match under route-map Leak-Route is not a valid command syntax. The option route-map Leak-Route permit 20 would permit all routes not explicitly denied by previous statements, which is not the goal here; we need to specifically match the leaked route.