In a centralized control policy using multiple match/action entries, which ordering method ensures Prefix List is evaluated before TLOC, and TLOC before Origin?

In Cisco SD-WAN centralized control policies, match/action entries are evaluated based on their sequence numbers. A lower sequence number indicates higher precedence. Therefore, to ensure a Prefix List is evaluated before a TLOC, and a TLOC before an Origin, you would assign lower sequence numbers to the Prefix List entry, followed by the TLOC entry, and then the Origin entry. This "lowest to highest sequence number" ordering is the standard and most common method for defining the evaluation order of policy rules. Deterministic order is a characteristic of this method, not the method itself. Highest to lowest sequence number would reverse the desired evaluation order. Nonsequential order would lead to unpredictable policy behavior.