Partner A set their ownership of an asset in Japan and Partner B set their ownership of the same asset in Korea. Partner A has a match policy of Monetize worldwide. Partner B has a match policy of Track worldwide. If a user video is matched and claimed against this asset, what is the applied policy?

YouTube's asset ownership and policy application prioritize the most restrictive policy and regional ownership. In this scenario, Partner A owns the asset in Japan and applies a "Monetize worldwide" policy. Partner B owns the same asset in Korea and applies a "Track worldwide" policy. When a user video matches this asset, the policies are applied based on the ownership regions. Therefore, in Japan, Partner A's "Monetize" policy applies. In Korea, Partner B's "Track" policy applies. The other options are incorrect because they either misrepresent the regional application of policies or incorrectly combine them.