When two partners each add worldwide ownership to a non-music asset, with Monetize policies, what happens to that asset?

When two partners both claim worldwide ownership of the same non-music asset with Monetize policies, YouTube's Content ID system detects this as an ownership conflict. In such cases, the asset enters a conflict state, and neither partner's monetization policy will be applied in the overlapping territories. This prevents double monetization and ensures fairness until the conflict is resolved. The revenue is not automatically split, nor does one partner's claim override the other's based on timing. The partners must resolve the ownership dispute, often by adjusting their ownership claims to specific territories or agreeing on a revenue share through a separate agreement outside of Content ID.