Which of the following would be the best solution to deploy a low-cost standby site that includes hardware and internet access?

A cold site is the best solution for a low-cost standby site with hardware and internet access because it provides a basic facility with essential infrastructure like power, cooling, and network connectivity, but without active equipment or data. This makes it significantly cheaper to maintain than other options. A hot site is fully equipped and operational, making it very expensive. A warm site has some equipment pre-installed but requires more setup than a hot site, thus costing more than a cold site. A recovery site is a general term for any site used for disaster recovery and doesn't specify the cost or readiness level.