Which QoS prioritization method is appropriate for interactive voice and video traffic?
Choose an answer
Tap an option to check your answer.
Correct answer: low-latency queuing.
Why this is the answer
Low-latency queuing (LLQ) is the most appropriate QoS prioritization method for interactive voice and video traffic. LLQ combines the benefits of priority queuing (PQ) and class-based weighted fair queuing (CBWFQ). It allows you to define a strict priority queue for delay-sensitive traffic like voice, ensuring that this traffic is always serviced first, minimizing latency and jitter. Other traffic types can then be handled by CBWFQ, receiving guaranteed bandwidth. Traffic policing is a mechanism to limit the input or output rate of a traffic class, dropping or remarking packets that exceed the configured rate, which doesn't prioritize real-time traffic for low latency. Round-robin scheduling processes queues in a cyclical fashion, which doesn't guarantee immediate service for time-sensitive data. Expedited Forwarding (EF) is a Per-Hop Behavior (PHB) defined in DiffServ, which marks traffic for preferential treatment but doesn't specify the queuing mechanism itself; LLQ is a common implementation that provides EF-like behavior.
Pass your exam — without the endless answer hunt
Get every verified question and explanation for this exam in one place, and save hours of prep. 1,000+ certifications · 20+ languages · free to start.
Pass your exam faster → No card needed