You manage a DFS Replication deployment with one hub server at HQ and 12 branch servers. Branch users frequently edit the same files as HQ users, causing conflicts, and replication backlogs occur when large files are changed. You must reduce conflicts and minimize backlogs. What should you do? (Choose two)

Converting branch members to read-only DFSR replicas directly addresses the conflict issue by preventing users at branches from making changes, thus eliminating write conflicts with HQ. Increasing the DFSR staging quota on both the hub and branches is crucial for handling large files. A larger staging quota allows the system to store entire large files before replication, reducing the likelihood of replication backlogs caused by insufficient space and minimizing retries that occur when staging areas fill up prematurely. Reconfiguring to a hub-and-spoke topology is already implied by "one hub server at HQ and 12 branch servers" and wouldn't directly solve conflicts or backlogs. Decreasing the staging quota would worsen the large file backlog problem.