You manage an Azure web app for e-commerce and need to increase logging when usage exceeds normal patterns while minimizing administrative overhead. Which two resources should you include in the solution?

An Azure Monitor alert with a dynamic threshold is correct because it automatically adjusts the alert criteria based on historical data and usage patterns, effectively identifying abnormal usage without manual threshold tuning. This minimizes administrative overhead compared to a static threshold, which would require frequent manual adjustments. An Azure Automation runbook is correct because it allows you to automate tasks, such as increasing logging verbosity, in response to an alert. This provides the necessary action to increase logging when the dynamic threshold is breached. An Azure Monitor alert with a static threshold is incorrect because it requires manual adjustment as usage patterns change, increasing administrative overhead. Azure Monitor autoscale settings are incorrect because they manage resource scaling, not logging levels. An Azure Monitor alert that uses an action group with an email action is incorrect because while it notifies, it doesn't automate the logging increase itself.