Your agricultural division is experimenting with fully autonomous vehicles. You want your architecture to promote strong security during vehicle operation. Which two architectures should you consider? (Choose two.)

Treating every microservice call as untrusted aligns with the Zero Trust security model, which is crucial for autonomous vehicles where compromise of one module could have severe consequences. This approach mandates strict authentication and authorization for all internal communications, enhancing overall system security. Using a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) and verifying firmware and binaries on boot establishes a hardware root of trust, ensuring that the vehicle's software stack is legitimate and untampered with from the moment it starts, which is fundamental for secure operation. Requiring IPv6 for connectivity doesn't inherently ensure a secure address space; security depends on implementation, not just the protocol version. Using a functional programming language doesn't directly address security vulnerabilities in the same way Zero Trust or hardware-based trust does. Multiple connectivity subsystems provide redundancy, not necessarily enhanced security. A Faraday cage protects against electromagnetic interference, not against software vulnerabilities or malicious internal communications.