You asked your colleague to provide feedback on a blog post you recently wrote. When they sent you their feedback, they made edits directly in the doc. Is this a best practice for a content editing process?

Yes, because having an editor complete your content ensures it will read well to others.

Yes, a content editor's role is to make updates the way they see fit.

No, the editor should have tracked changes which would have shown you where they would apply recommended edits.

No, they should have set up a meeting to discuss each edit so you could apply them together.

Choose an option to see if it’s correct. Check the explanation below.

Want to Earn All HubSpot Certifications in No Time?

Then check out our exclusive 👉 HubSpot Special Offer All in One!. This comprehensive package includes questions, answers, and detailed explanations for each Hubpot certification. Get everything you need to achieve success faster.

Explanation: You asked your colleague to provide feedback on a blog post you recently wrote. When they sent you their feedback, they made edits directly in the doc. Is this a best practice for a content editing process?

Explanation: The correct answer is **No, the editor should have tracked changes which would have shown you where they would apply recommended edits.** Utilizing tracked changes is a best practice in content editing processes as it allows for transparent and collaborative editing while maintaining the integrity of the original document. When an editor makes edits directly in the document without using tracked changes, it can be challenging for the author to identify and understand the changes made, potentially leading to confusion or overlooking important revisions. Tracked changes provide a clear record of edits, allowing the author to review each change individually, accept or reject them as appropriate, and understand the rationale behind the edits. Additionally, tracked changes facilitate communication between the author and editor, enabling them to discuss proposed edits and revisions collaboratively, ensuring that the final content meets the desired standards and objectives. By adhering to best practices such as using tracked changes, content editing processes can be more efficient, transparent, and conducive to producing high-quality content. Therefore, in the context of the question, utilizing tracked changes would have been a more effective approach for the content editing process compared to making direct edits without clear indication or communication.

Special Bundle Offer HubSpot Roll. All in One

Note: We conduct daily checks for updates on the exam, ensuring that the file contains the most recent questions from the actual certification program.

Questions | Answers | Explanations. FREE Updates.

Download now - 45 usd.

You asked your colleague to provide feedback on a blog post you recently wrote. When they sent you their feedback, they made edits directly in the doc. Is this a best practice for a content editing process?

Explanation: You asked your colleague to provide feedback on a blog post you recently wrote. When they sent you their feedback, they made edits directly in the doc. Is this a best practice for a content editing process?

Special Bundle Offer HubSpot Roll. All in One

You may also be interested: